Females Murdering Parents
‘Die you dog’ daughter NOT Guilty of Murder
A Sydney woman who stabbed her mother with a 12-centimetre kitchen knife and then screamed “die, die you dog!” as the bleeding woman rang triple-0 for help has been found guilty of manslaughter but not guilty of murder.
Krystal Jade Seymour, 25, stabbed her mother, Donna Marie Seymour, in the arm in the early hours of November 24, 2010, after a heated argument in the pair’s Giraween home, severing a major artery that caused her to bled to death.
During the trial in the NSW Supreme Court, the jury was played a triple-0 call in which the injured woman tells the operator: “I’m bleeding to death, she has cut an artery.”
In the background Seymour is heard screaming: “Die you f—ing dog, die! I hate you, I f—ing hate you.”
Seymour later admitted to stabbing her mother but said she was acting in self-defence and did not intend to kill her.
“She charged at me and she head-butted me,” the 25-year-old reportedly told police.
$2000 Fine for False Allegation of Sexual Assault
A remarkable tale of a false accuser, but only because in this rare instance the false sexual assault claim was penalised.
This woman, allegedly an unemployed sole carer for her young child, who was arrested for drunken disorderly behaviour outside a Melbourne nightclub at a time when most parents would be fast asleep, made claims that she was sexually assaulted by Police, claims that were later found to be false. As a result, she was paraded in Court as a false accuser and was fined $2000. Quite fitting really.
I think however this incident says a lot more about the Police not willing to accept any attacks on their own integrity, than it says about a willingness by the system to penalise false allegations.
And in the scheme of things, I would have to say that the false allegations of Ms Karly Enid Jean Mitchel were minor, if not insignificant, to the kind of false allegations that all too often get made every day, that in fact destroy lives.
In this case the false allegations would have been a minor inconvenience to the accused police officers, who had the backing of witnesses and CCTV.
Had these false allegations of rape been made in the context of a Family Court proceeding, or in the midst of a domestic argument, a separation, or even a date gone wrong, you can bet your bottom dollar that there would have been no fine, no penalty, no prison, at least not for the one making the false allegation, even if proven that it was a “knowingly false allegation.”
Fraud in Australia’s plan to reduce violence against women
The 2009 Australian project a ‘Time for Action: The National Council’s Plan for Australia to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children, 2009-2021′, was approved for implementation by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG). The Plan, which is split into several parts, puts forth recommendations for new legislation, changes to judicial processes, requests for funding and ideas for domestic programs targeted at reducing domestic and sexual violence against women. The advisory council has some powers to implement programs through the Office of Women among other agencies, but much of what the government funded program calls for requires approval by Parliament.
The entire premise of the National Plan was underpinned by the belief in this statement:“While a small proportion of men are victims of domestic violence and sexual assault, the majority of people who experience this kind of violence are women in a home, at the hands of men they know.”[27-pg1] But a quick examination of the statistics and data shows a much different picture to the rather sweeping indictment of Australian men the National Council paints.
‘Hate Male’ laws an international epidemic – Israel is no exception
Jerusalem, Israel — November 21, 2011 …. A civil protest took place in Tel Aviv, Israel on November 8, 2011 against Family Court Judge Rivka Mekayes’ participation in an Israel bar’s conference on the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Rivka Mekayes is described by many divorced fathers in Israel as being perhaps the most notorious, gender biased family Court Judge in Israel responsible for disengaging fathers from children and thousands of parental alienation cases, created by herself, as she believes that women’s independence means sole custody of children with mothers.
Mekayes was scheduled to speak at the Israel bar on November 8, 2011 on the children’s rights during divorce.
This is “too late and too crooked”, said the Coalition for the Children and Family in Israel and Fathers 4 Justice Israel, fighting for fathers’ and childrens’ rights. It is most ironic for this Judge in Israel to lecture on Implementing Child Participation in Family Court Proceedings”.
Family Violence bill (family law amendment) update – time to Speak Up!
Because of the emphasis that the Gillard government had placed on passing the Carbon Tax legislation in the lower house, the final vote of the Family Violence bill has been delayed.
We believe now that it will be voted on in the Senate on the 31st October, and expect it to be passed given the support of the Greens.
However will still need to show our opposition to this malicious bill, so Fathers4Equality have rolled out a tool (the Email Megaphone) we used on previous occasions, which resulted in almost 1 million emails being sent to local members in Parliament in 2005.
The Megaphone provides one email to be written, and then sent as an personalised email to numerous politicians.
It is a super-easy tool to use, and we would encourage you to visit and use it daily, until the final vote on this is finalised.
http://www.fathers4equality-australia.org/mailsend/anti-family-bill.nsf/frmSendMail
Highest UK Court Supports Deceit of Mother in Child Abductions
A deceitful English mother who acquired the support of her Australian ex-husband to take their Australian born children for a holiday to the UK, and then refused to return back to Australia despite her previous undertakings, has won her legal battle to remain in the UK with the children.
The children’s father, an Australian citizen, had obtained an Australian High Court Family Division order that the eight-year-old boy and his two-year-old sister must be sent to back to Australia, and because of the mother’s past abusive behaviour, the High Court ordered that the children live with him.
Senate Committee divided over shared parenting rollback
Press Release for immediate release: Senate Committee divided over shared parenting rollback
The Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee yesterday approved changes to family law legislation that will remove even more fathers from their children’s lives.
The Committee divided down party lines. Coalition members submitted a minority report rejecting the changes, but the Labor controlled committee agreed with the much broader definition of domestic violence, the removal of penalties for knowingly making false allegations and the requirement for parents to be supportive of each other’s role in their children’s lives, as contained in the Attorney General’s new Family Law Amendment (Family violence) Bill 2010. The Greens went further, suggesting the removal of shared parental responsibility provisions, previously known as ‘guardianship’ arrangements, illustrating their total disregard for fathers and our traditional family structure.
Push to streamline court systems on family violence
Gillard takes aim at Fathers.
The recommendation is contained in a 1500-page, two-volume report by the Australian Law Reform and NSW Law Reform Commissions.
