Gillard a turn-off for Men…even before she passes new anti-father family law changes
Life Insurance Quotes - Get Life Insurance Now, Fast Efficient and Reliable. Protect your children's tomorrow by preparing for their interests today. Life Insurance Quotes Australia
Julia’s man problems
Julia Gillard has got a serious problem with Australian men. So much so that she is soon about to pass the most malicious anti-male laws this country has ever seen, which will effectively presume that all separated men are Wife Abusers or Child Sexual Predators, that is an effective presumption of Guilt against separated fathers. This bill will rely on the subjective thoughts of the alleged victim to determine guilt or innocence, not on objective or conclusive facts.
So these new laws effectively mean that even if an event did not occur, a separated father will still be judged to be an abuser, because all the alleged victim has to do is say that she is scared…no facts or proof required.
Julia Gillard has even more man problem’s on the horizon, even before this anti-male bill is passed into law. As the popularity of our first female prime minister plummets, government insiders fear men are turning on Ms Gillard for a variety of reasons, some to do with her anti-male feminist background, others to do with her consistent dishonesty in the public arena.
While Opposition leader Tony Abbott fought off a perception that he had a problem with female voters, polling suggests the PM has a much more significant gender battle to wage.
Political analysts say polling shows she is significantly losing the support of male voters compared to women.
Newspoll figures over the course of Ms Gillard’s leadership show the gap between males and females has widened in her satisfaction rating and that of better prime minister.
A Newspoll in August, shortly after Ms Gillard became leader, shows 49 per cent of men thought she would make a better prime minister than Tony Abbott. In the latest Newspoll published last month, the figure dropped to 39 per cent.
Among female voters, 47 per cent of women believe Ms Gillard would make a better prime minister, down from 52 per cent last year.
In contrast, support for Mr Abbott among males and females over the same period remained almost unchanged.
Ms Gillard’s satisfaction rating also had the biggest decline among men – down from 43 per cent last year to 31 per cent among males compared with a fall from 45 per cent to 38 per cent for women.
An analysis of Newspoll results for Kevin Rudd shows support among male and female voters in terms of satisfaction and better prime minister when he was leader dropped almost equally.
Galaxy pollster David Briggs said the figures showed men appeared to be turning off Ms Gillard.
He said the trend was similar to poll results experienced by Queensland Premier Anna Bligh, who was also losing support among men faster than women.
“The results for Gillard paint a similar picture to Anna Bligh, with support for both tending to hold up more strongly among women,” Mr Briggs said.
“Men do appear to be turning off Gillard while women are appearing more willing to give her a go.”
Mr Briggs said the latest Galaxy poll shows support for Ms Bligh had dropped to pre-flood levels, with the biggest loss of support also among men.
A Labor source said it was clear Ms Gillard was being judged more harshly by men.
“Men are definitely tougher on female leaders,” the source said.
“People have said Tony has a problem with women, but the results show Julia does seem to be having a problem with the blokes.
“Unfortunately for Julia, she has been at the centre of a political shit-storm – the whole Rudd stuff – not being able to govern in her own right. It certainly hasn’t been easy for her.”
—
Get a deep knowledge of your entitled human rights through reading rights books.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
http://www.fathersunionaustralia.com
“All cooperative schemes which provide equal remuneration to the skilled and industrious and the ignorant and idle must work their own downfall, for by this unjust plan … they must of necessity eliminate the valuable members … and retain only the improvident, unskilled, and vicious.”
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
August 15th, 2011 at 3:55 am
Correct Quolls. The guvment is making it a “race to the bottom” by destroying the productive in favour of the idle. We saw what this did in Russia.
[Reply]
In actual fact, these sham courts tyrannize women too. It is ridiculous to say they don’t.
The standard procedure is to reward the party which brings them the business. ie. whoever wants the divorce gets rewarded. Not really what the “no fault” legislation was intended to achieve but in courts without juries, we’re all (men and women) are vulnerable to bureaucratic tyranny.
I think we’d get much more empathy from the community by making it an issue of individual liberty versus the State, rather than a battle between the sexes.
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
August 15th, 2011 at 3:58 am
Sure Jonah,
my wife was “tyannised” by being given welfare, 95% of the proceeds of my 25 years of labour, Irish citizenship and a job at the end of it.
I wish someone would “tyrannise” me like that.
Get with the program. 19 out of 20 men get a a FAR from equitable deal out of the FCs. Now that a few women are getting it a little less blatantly one sided idiots like you pretend that “women get tyrannised too”.
I doubt you will get much of a listening from the 4,000 men who kill themselves every year from the tyranny they endure. While, on the other hand, there is no evidence women commit suicide in divorce more than the background population of women.
[Reply]
Jonah Stiffhausen Reply:
December 14th, 2011 at 8:47 pm
Peter, just stumbled across your reply to me. Did you, or your wife, take them the business? If it was your wife, then my argument holds.
I’m with the program, old cock, don’t worry. Haven’t seen my children for seven years and have spend over eight months imprisoned at various times courtesy of these sham courts. You can quote your statistics till you’re black in the face but it’s not convincing and merely doing what the totalitarians do.
[Reply]
Hi Steve,
we do not need the government to be thrown out.
All members of the federal parliament, both houses, and all members of the NSW state parliament, both houses, are about to be put on trial.
We do not need to make changes for fathers and kids.
What is required is fathers to be willing to sit on our new juries in our new courts. I recommend the ONLY question you ask fathers is whether they are willing to sit on new juries in new courts that we are organising. They show their willingness to do this by registering to the CAF site.
All that any father NEEDS to do to start defending his children and the children of his fellow men is to register to this site, read the book in post 1, read the procedure manual, and be ready to sit on a jury when called upon.
We are doing the rest.
If a man wishes to free himself? He can use the book. If he wishes someone else to help him use the book because he is not willing to read it himself and learn it himself? Then he can pay that man to do his study for him the same way he pays a plumber, electrician, car mechanic, or, indeed, a criminal known as a lawyer. And yes. ALL lawyers are aware of the criminal aspects of their profession.
[Reply]
kyle Reply:
August 2nd, 2011 at 9:22 pm
Where do you read “the book” in “post 1″? Where is this posted?
Thank u.
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
August 15th, 2011 at 2:10 am
Kyle,
the book written with me as “typist” is on this link. At the bottom. Its a PDF you can download. If you use http://www.hidemyass.com you can view the video that walks you through the book as well.
I have used all the sample documents in the book with the conspicuous exception of the new common law marriage agreement. Can’t see me getting married again.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia/Forums/tabid/82/forumid/1/threadid/538/scope/posts/Default.aspx
Best Regards
Peter
[Reply]
The courts and legal aid are over run with corrupt fems, running syndicated corruption with their “approved and preferred” magistrates; lawyers and consultants lists.
Their focus is beating up fathers to appease the tax funded bureaucratic pay-master fems whom are throwing out billions of your dollars, while ignoring children’s needs.
Kids and your only chance is to get rid of the labor party from office, you need to start campaigning against ALP now for the next election…
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
July 27th, 2011 at 6:25 am
Steve,
if you wish to be part of the remedy I suggest you contact me at peter@peternolan.com
[Reply]
Steve Reply:
July 28th, 2011 at 11:21 am
Hi Peter,
I’m not saying you can’t over through a government with 50 people, it has been done, but not by nice people.
The reality is ‘hitler’ ‘stalin’’pol pot’’sadam hussien’’robert mugabe’’omar al bashir’’kim jong ll’’than shwe’ etc would be at their best with a bullet in the back of the head.
It is the sociopathic bureaucracies public servants that put them in power and are supporting them, good people are the prey, helpless from these predators, always will be.
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
July 31st, 2011 at 3:13 am
Steve,
I have never claimed to wish to over throw the government of the COA. I claim that they are easily ignored. I asked you if you wanted to be part of the remedy. You didn’t say yes….did you?
PS. Those you list were put in place by the Illuminati.
Steve Reply:
August 1st, 2011 at 10:46 pm
If we can get the numbers behind us we can through out the government.
Only then will they stand up and pay attention.
Make the changes kids and Dad’s need.
Join us and sent this to your mates …
http://www.fathersunionaustralia.com/
Drama Queens, not to make little of genuine, down to earth dads who want to handle their situations maturely but a lot of you guys could do with serious communication skills and some impulse control. Then maybe you might get some more serious attention. As for Julia well I think you need to stop bashing her for being female that is so lame. All pollies are deceptive that is how politics works.
[Reply]
Steve Reply:
July 26th, 2011 at 10:50 am
She is so creepy she has to be lesbian her partner is soo gay too
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
July 27th, 2011 at 6:29 am
“TAJackson says:
JULY 26, 2011 AT 1:43 AM
Drama Queens, not to make little of genuine, down to earth dads who want to handle their situations maturely but a lot of you guys could do with serious communication skills and some impulse control. ”
Maybe this kind of serious communication eh?
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia/Forums/tabid/82/forumid/97/scope/threads/Default.aspx
All federal politicans are about to be put on trial. They are ALL criminals who have made every effort to hide their crimes.
Julia Gillard will very likely also be put on trial for treason. Since she wanted to be equal I will be asking that she be hung from the neck until dead as the remedy from the jury.
[Reply]
Julia Gillard is a turn-off to grandparents as well, for not supporting the rights of children to know and have a relationship with their grandparents (Section 60b 2b & 2e) Family Law Act 1975.
[Reply]
The whole “family law” racket is nothing but an outrageous abuse of power and the question is, how long are we going to put up with it.
A motley collection of State flunkeys claim the right to impose unwanted divorces on legally unimpeachable individuals in sham courts, bereft of juries, and not only that, but to steal our children to boot. If we object to the process, they then jail us (without trial) for breaching orders criminalizing our freedom of association and movement.
These “specialized” courts are nothing more than politicized chambers, going where no State has the right to venture in a free society.
I’m not sure campaigning politicians is the way to go. They are the problem, not the answer. All these “family law” enquiries and commissions are merely window dressing, designed to quell the natives’ unrest at what is little more than tyranny.
[Reply]
Steve Reply:
July 26th, 2011 at 12:32 pm
The courts and legal aid are over run with corrupt fems, running syndicated corruption with their “approved and preferred” magistrates; lawyers and consultants lists.
Their focus is beating up fathers to appease the tax funded bureaucratic pay-master fems whom are throwing out billions of your dollars, while ignoring children’s needs.
Kids and your only chance is to get rid of the labor party from office, you need to start campaigning against ALP now for the next election.
[Reply]
Im going through the court system at the moment fighting for my sons right to have his fathers contact that he has a very strong bond to
i have never done anything wrong by the mother or my son its only her sister that has finally convinced her to leave me and move near by her.
but in order to make me look less respectable the mother throws fallacious obstacles in my way most are very easy to produce hard evidence in showing they are simply not true but non the less in court and just about anywhere i try to turn to for help im looked down upon as scum of the earth and receive no help what so ever even legal aid has let me down because of claims made and i will be seen as guilty until a month later the courts see my undeniable evidence. while the mother is supported by everyone and is using extreme underhanded tactics that have no grounds for action the sort that in any other case would have the book thrown at them for devising the law.Taking away my sons right to have access to me is barbaric his 11 months old and completely devastated from his mothers actions and for what…. so the mother can have her own way and remove my sons father out of his future.
i never struck either the mother or my son i never threatened i haven’t even raised my voice what got to her the most was i was always supportive to her feelings even when she was trying to wind me up for a fall. and for this i know have an AVO that has been taking months to be heard just to clear my name.
Fathers need equal rights and support genderism should be seen no differently to racism
i was the primary career for my Son i woke up with him i feed and made his food for as well made lunch and dinner for the mother i ran a business from home i changed his nappies i took him where his mother slept for his breast feeds i played with him i carried him around when he wanted cuddles we were the best of buddies with a highly strong bond.
now after the mother listening to her sisters advice for the 20th time trying to get her to move to a drug infested suburb with factory’s full of pollution. a place i stated i did not want my son to grow up in
and with the law so one sided and eyes closed i will be lucky if i see him again before his old enough to find me for himself
Bad call Tony it only makes me wonder what underlines this decision you have made in a system that is so unfair to begin with
you only have to look at people who grew up all there life wanting to know who there father was and sad they missed out seeing them for so many years to know its in the child’s best interest
im very sure if my 11 month old son could articulate just one word on this matter that word would be NO
(my AVO is based on apparently continually ringing and texting causing harassment my phone records state 2 phone calls consisting of 4 & 9 minutes and one text message non of which are uncivil and are in regards to my sons welfare)
[Reply]
Zac Reply:
July 19th, 2011 at 1:08 pm
Brad..You can’t get an AVO against you based on two ‘civil’ phone calls.
Where was your duty solicitor?…
You are heading for (court ordered) mediation or an expensive Family Report, in the least, if you can’t get some access to your son through your ex.
This professional intervention may admonish or condemn you so it is important to stay calm and cool through this process even if you’re, understandibly, angry and upset. Your conscience should tell you whether you have stuffed up in the past..so if there is mud slinging by your ex you should prepare calm and proper responses to those ‘lies’ , exaggerations etc.
Keep a concise diary and get some support. If you don’t ‘lose it’ you will be reunited with your son…but it may take weeks, months or years so pace yourself for the long haul battle.
[Reply]
jonah Reply:
July 21st, 2011 at 1:25 pm
Not so. You can find yourself the recipient of one of these outrageous measures without even realizing it has been sought.
Political measures, designed to remove parents from their children. The big money/billable hours in this racket are in the quaintly named “custody battle” and stealing someone’s children in this manner, ensures there will be one.
It is an elaborate kidnapping and extortion racket and illustrates.
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
July 27th, 2011 at 6:35 am
Zac, get with the program….a man can be subject to an AVO even without any contact at all. The woman merely needs to claim she is fearful.
The guvment is a criminal organisation as are the lawyers and judiciary.
I have proven this.
[Reply]
Steve Reply:
July 21st, 2011 at 11:26 am
i’m going through exactly the same sinario.
Dads have been tolerant to offical abuse in the extreme, I can understand how Dad’s my be driven to attacking and ever disposing of corrupt magistrates, lawyers or officials.
Driven by the abuse of their Kids and all the harm the courts are doing to their Kids.
The sad reality is in a lot cases the courts are so over run with corruption and the complete lack of accountability of officials, the blatant offical abuse of Kids.
There simple is no other way justice will be served.
http://exposeyourgovernment.com/
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
July 27th, 2011 at 6:31 am
Brad, if you want to be part of the remedy I recommend you contact me at peter@peternolan.com.
[Reply]
Quolls Reply:
August 15th, 2011 at 2:34 am
http://www.fathersunionaustralia.com
[Reply]
I have been involved with the Family Law System as a Men’s Advocate and McKenzied Friend for some twenty years. In that time I have observed the Australian Family Law Court bastardise, abuse diminish and insult Australian Men and Fathers. I cannot help but wonder how much more abuse Men are willing to tolerate before they reach the end of their patience. How much longer will we withstand the injustices perpetrated against us? When will we take matters into our own hands, take control of our families and tell big brother where to get off? Don’t forget that our sons are the fathers of tomorrow and our daughters are the mothers of tomorrow. Yes we want what is best for our children; we want what is best for our grandchildren and great grandchildren also. We need to put a stop to Government bullying and interference!
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
July 27th, 2011 at 6:33 am
Simon. We are taking matters into our own hands. With your track record you would be welcome. Feel free to contact me at peter@peternolan.com if you wish to be part of the remedy.
[Reply]
House of Representatives Infosheet PETITIONS
http://www.aph.gov.au/house/info/infosheets/is11.pdf
Submitting a petition:
Petitions should be submitted by post to the Committee’s address is:
Standing Committee on Petitions
PO Box 6021
House of Representatives
Parliament House
CANBERRA ACT 2600
AUSTRALIA
How to lodge a petition to the Senate
Individuals and organisations may seek to have petitions presented to the Parliament. Petitions generally express views on matters of public policy and ask the Parliament to take or, in some cases, not to take a particular course of action.
Each House of the Parliament has its own rules that documents must follow in order to be accepted as petitions. To be accepted by the Senate,
a petition must be addressed to the Senate;
and must be presented by a Senator
http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/work/petitions/petitions.htm
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
July 31st, 2011 at 3:23 am
Ian,
would you petition the mafia to stop criminal activities?
The guvment and judiciary (and many other sectors) are knowing criminals.
You don’t petition criminals to commit less crime. You put them on trial. If you do not put them on trial then you deserve to be the victim of their crimes.
[Reply]
Ian Mack Reply:
July 31st, 2011 at 12:54 pm
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)
Tell me, how do you prosecute these criminals in a Court their Brethren sit in judgment on?
I filed in the FamCA an “application for leave” to file a Contempt of Court in the Face of the Court action citing Mushin J for the crimes Mushin J committed in the Court, he was sitting in judgement on, that were committed in Contempt or Breach of the Oath or Affirmation Mushin J had given to the Court before he could sit at the Bench of the Court.
Mushin J’s crimes included: changing a mothers’ evidence without asking the mother if that was the evidence the mother intended to give. Plus fabricating evidence I had lied to the Court by wrongful claim I had said (given evidence) to the Court I had not and proceeded to badger me about his fabrication I had lied to the Court. The final straw was the threats that if my mother was to give evidence that was not helpful to my ex, she would be badgered by him.
This only names a few of the Crimes Mushin J committed that if a Contempt of Court in the Face of the Court had been determined then s.72(ii) of the Constitution evidence of Judicial Misbehaviour would have been produced for Parliament to PRAY for Mushin J’s title of judge be removed.
The Dishonourable Bryant CJ finally allowed me a hearing before her Dishonourable judgeship for her to claim the “Doctrine of Common-Law Judicial Immunity” (Kirby J of the High Court agreed)overrides the Constitution and Laws created by Parliament, and Mushin J was therefore immune from any prosecution of any crime he might commit in Contempt of his Oath or Affirmation of Office in the Face of the Court (makes judicial oaths and affirmations a joke on the people does it not).
That an appeal of Bryant CJ’s orders was delayed by the High Court for 11 months where on Kirby J determined the appeal without hearing and claimed the Dishonourable Bryant CJ was right and a judge is immune from prosecution.
Then I sought a s.75(v) of the Constitution bestowed on the FamCA by s.34 of the Family Law Act 1975(Cth) for a determination that MUSHIN J HAD COMMITTED WRONGS and caused the Orders he made, to be other than safe, thereby should be QUASHED by a Writ of Certiorari.
The then Carter J and Coleman, Thackray and May JJ then in Contempt/Breach of their Oaths or Affirmation of Office (with criminal intent of perverting justice) claimed they did not know if the Court had power to determine a s.34 of the Act issue (Writ of Certiorari) presented or leave was sought to file.
Thackray J did publish a paper about the FamCA power to determine a s.75(v) of the Constitution bestowed by s.34 of the Act issue, but that paper appears to have been removed from the public window.
When a determination of that Writ was sought in the High Court, Kiefel J WRONGLY (with criminal intent) claimed I had had an appeal of Mushin J’s Orders heard and determined (this never occurred) and to seek a Writ after an appeal was an “Abuse of Process”.
A “Leave to Appeal” before a single judge was filed. Hayne and Crennan JJ in abuse of their “Special Leave” power claimed a right to hear and determine that “Leave to Appeal application” without hearing, in the Court I was present in, when they Wilfully denied me a right to be heard and allowed members of their Court to yell and scream at me when I objected to being denied a right to be heard.
A complaint of “Dereliction of Duty” was attempted to be filed with the Federal Police in Canberra, on the day Hayne and Crennan JJ perverted justice in my prosecution before the High Court, but the Feds refused to accept my complaint and later denied any knowledge of my attendance on them that day.
So I ask again, how do you prosecute a matter the office of the AG tells you 2 days prior to the High Court hearing date you are not going to be allowed to be heard because litigation must end?
P.S.
Yes, I still have copies of the evidence of these judges Criminal Misbehaviours: “Perversions of Justice” by “Abuse of Power to Cause a Party a Detriment” of a denial of a course of justice created by a Law of the Commonwealth that were “Derelictions of Duty”.
Thereby, if any of these judges sought remuneration or it was received by these judges, crimes were committed against the Government of Australia by these judges of Fraudulently receiving remuneration for “Duty’s not Preformed”.
Furthermore, criminal Contempts of the Court in the Face of the Court by judicial misbehaviour in Contempt of these judges Oath or Affirmation of Office have also been committed.
The evidence is: Admissions or evidence of guilt by or within these judges “Reasons for Judgement”, transcripts of hearings where the words of the judges can be proven beyond doubt and the applications for courses of justice created by Laws of the Commonwealth.
S.43 of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) creates these denials of courses of justice to be a “Perversion of Justice” and Chapter 7 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code 1995 also create laws that these judges (Commonwealth Public Official) misbehaviours are crimes.
How do you cause a s.72(ii) of the Constitution (judicial proven misbehaviour) to occur when the Dishonourable AG McClelland refuses to allow evidence of those judges crimes from being presented to Parliament when it has been presented to him via his office?
How do you cause an MP to be held accountable for Misrepresentations made to Parliament when the Honourable Speaker will not comply with his duty to stand the House Down until he is satisfied the Misrepresentation by an MP was not for an other than lawful purpose without seeking submissions from those the MP has been citied for committing Misrepresentation to the House?
[Reply]
Carol Reply:
July 31st, 2011 at 7:24 pm
The judiciary is a criminal organisation. Therefore, we are required to create our own courts. If you would like to make oath to be willing to be a juror in our new courts please register to the CAF site.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
August 2nd, 2011 at 1:13 pm
Hi Ian,
I have been travelling and will be doing so again from tomorrow. Carol kindly answered for me.
You may be surprised to know that from what you cite no crimes were committed, very likely. You do not understand what is really going on. And until you do understand what is really going on you will be hopelessly defeated by the criminals in the judiciary.
The commonwealth of australia is a uniform commercial code legal entity. NOT a soverereign nation. The people in parliament do not represent the people who live on the land of Australia. They represented the People of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. That would be the owners of that legal entity. NOT YOU. NOT ME.
They use a language called “legalese” which sounds very much like english but it is not.
A judge or magistrate is actually acting as the captain of a pirate ship whos only loyalty is to the Regent or Crown depending on what you like. Therefore the judges and magistrates can actually do anything they like lawfully as they can always cite the privilege of captaincy of a ship and acting in the interests of the regent.
They can put aside ALL legislation. Hell. It is PERFECTLY LAWFUL AND LEGAL for a judge or magistrate to kill a man who challenges him in HIS court.
It really is time for men to start to realise that the government is a criminal cartel, an aspect of a “ruling oligarchy” and that the judges and magistrates are right in there with them.
This is why I laboured for three years to produce the remedy and a book that shows men that remedy. Only problem is? Men don’t want to read, they don’t want to learn, and they therefore deserve their slavery.
Example. Have you read the book written through me?
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia/Forums/tabid/82/forumid/1/threadid/538/scope/posts/Default.aspx
Have you read the draft procedure manual?
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia/Forums/tabid/82/forumid/99/threadid/190/scope/posts/Default.aspx
These are the things you are well advised to read.
You could also view the video I took of my family law case that proves the man calling himself david dunkley was committing the crime of impersonating a public officer..namely a federal magistrate.
I am the only man in the world to have done that. Its about time other men actually took a little notice of the evidence that was so hard won to show the REAL crimes going on.
Then we have more siucides by fathers of children,or more killings because the Family law court and Child support have know idea the cruelty they place on already greiving fathers, Men that some have come home to their clothes out on the front doorstep and have know idea why, They have been Judged and drawn and hung out before they know whats happend before they even know what happend, And there dosent have to be a stick of evidence against the mother she can say whatever she wants and the family law court and child support will beleive every word with no proof needed ..been through it and there,s nothing worse than to watch a fully grown man cry , Good luck to all the dads out there who now will have Nothing at all, If I could change the laws in this country Id start with this one for all the dads who have loved and lost …..everything
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
August 2nd, 2011 at 1:21 pm
Linda,
if you actually want to help Carol and colleagues are setting up ALL WOMENS COURTS to fairly and justly try women who commit crimes against men.
The FACT that the courts only get a chance to destroy the fathers based on women committing perjury is not lost on men. Perjury is a crime and women who claimed equality must make remedy for the crime of perjury. I have been pointing this out for three years now. For doing so I am called a woman-hater, a wife beater and a paedophile.
The LAST thing woman want is to be responsible for what they say under oath.
To date we only have 4 women willing to create such juries. The REST of the women therefore support and condone women committing crimes against men because silence in the face of a crime is to condone it.
How would women react if men stayed silent when they knew the identity of an actual rapist. That’s right. They would be shrieking from the highest yardarm. So you have the chance to be part of the remedy now carol has shown me this thread. You can do so by contacting me on peter@peternolan.com
[Reply]
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) Reply:
August 15th, 2011 at 2:13 am
No surprise that I didn’t hear from Linda. All these women who “wish men well” but openly condone crimes against men make me sick. The level of hypocrisy is astounding. And they seem to be quite happy to be such hypocrites…but hate being called the same.
[Reply]