Female teacher arrested for having sex with five students
Life Insurance Quotes - Get Life Insurance Now, Fast Efficient and Reliable. Protect your children's tomorrow by preparing for their interests today. Life Insurance Quotes Australia
A 27 year old married teacher with three children, Â has been jailed after being accused of having sex with five of her students during an orgy at her home.
Police said Brittni Nicole Colleps also exchanged sexually-explicit text and picture messages with the students prior to her arrest.
Brittni Colleps, invited the boys to her home for the sex romp and the encounter was filmed on their cell phones.
The 27-year-old’s husband was away overseas on duty serving with the US military.
Colleps, an English teacher and girl’s basketball coach, faces up to ten years in jail after being charged with five felony counts of inappropriate relationships between a student and a teacher.
Although all five of the teens involved with Colleps were 18 years of age or older, Texas law prohibits sex between a teacher and a student, regardless of the student’s age.
According to a police arrest warrant affidavit, the investigation into Colleps began after a 19-year-old student told investigators about his sexual relationship with his English teacher.
The student told police the relationship began with sexually explicit text messages and photos that they sent to each other for about a week in late April.
Later that month the student drove to Colleps home in Arlington, Texas where they had sex.
He later received a text message from the teacher saying they ‘had fun’ and an invite back to the house.
When he arrived there were four other students from Kennedale High School present and they told police they all had sex with Colleps.
When police analyzed the teen’s phone they found video footage of him and Colleps having sex. They also found sexually explicit photos and text messages the pair had sent each other.
Police later interviewed a second student who said he was present when the sex romp took place.
School officials learned about the teacher’s alleged relationships and put her on leave with pay.
Schools Superintendent Gary Dugger posted a letter on the school’s website saying that the district was cooperating with investigators.
‘As the alleged acts occurred off campus, once Kennedale ISD personnel were put on notice, immediate action was taken,’ the letters says.
Colleps is being held in the Arlington jail on $125,000 bail after turning herself into police on Monday.
Ms Colleps could face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000 if convicted.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
I went to a high school in country Victoria where a 20 something student teacher got a year 11 girl pregnant which led to a marraige. In the same school a year ten girl allowed the same (now, fully qualified) teacher to caress her in the adjoining teachers office during class and she progressed, the following year, to letting another (married) teacher screw her at a year 11 party held at the teacher’s farm.
On top of this our female phys-ed teacher screwed a year 11 student at a drunken weekend party and there were countless teacher spouse swapping parties that led to more permanent relationships. All very confusing , but tell me if this was not the norm in the 1970′s
[Reply]
Feminaziz will still manage to get away and our government will set her free in the name of “Women Empowerment” !!!
It has been happeing and will continue till women grow up and Men get smart.
Women are not always the victim !! break the MINDSET and start accepting the fact… WOMEN too kill,rape, watch child-porn, masturbate, ….. STOP seeing it as a gender issue!!!
[Reply]
Craig Reply:
May 20th, 2011 at 5:14 pm
why don’t you talk about the impact of, hmmm, lets see Impact on kids when they are the new stolen generation, why don’t you accept women (not all) use the system to get what they can out of seperation/divorce and don’t care about the impact on kids, just try talking about it, I expect you can’t, see we here, are for the kids, to make it for the kids, we need all of the truth, not just womens support group truths, we need all of it out in the open and people are trying to shut us up because their argument will be pathetic
[Reply]
Perhaps you can tell me where exactly the hateful rants are?
All I see are articles showing that both men and women are capable of the same type of malicious crimes.
Perhaps you should stop trying to satisfy the feminists and start being respectful to the truth.
This is what really frustrates me with men sometimes.
You are your own worst enemies.
Stop being such an apologist and stick to your beliefs, because you will otherwise get swallowed up and spat out just like the millions of other men.
[Reply]
dave aldridge. Reply:
May 19th, 2011 at 3:59 am
Just go to sites like anonymums for a start Mary S and yes you are exactly right in that BOTH men and women ARE capable of the same type of malicious crimes. On the “safer family law site” when i questioned why their,” in memorium”, mentioned ONLY children who had been murdered by their fathers and not one single case of a mother who had murdered her child despite there being many examples of such [you only have to read the news to see them} my post lasted less than one day and i was immediately banned, and for doing far less than Rag or Lindal have done on here, When i went to the Melinda Stratton support site and merely stated that i hoped she would get the same sentence that a man would get for a similar crime the same thing happened, i have seen women on that site also who were banned and called “traitors to the cause” by women exactly like Rag and Lindal. Yet their posts remain here and they have not been banned, SURELY that must tell you something. Don’t worry the system tried to swallow ME up and spit me out but failed miserably and my child was the ultimate winner. My own lovely new bride went through 19 years of an abusive marriage and a very close friend of both of us went through many years of a quite violent marriage, but then i also went through years of abuse also and my daughter even more so from a mother who as it turns out suffers from bi-polar disorder.
[Reply]
Craig Reply:
May 19th, 2011 at 4:38 am
Dave my new Wife and her kids suffered abuse by the Father too, he no longer plays a part in their lives, it has been suggested to me that my ex is bi polar, but i figure they are looking for an out for her
[Reply]
Craig Reply:
May 19th, 2011 at 4:03 am
and there my frinds is the truth, we do, and to the bra burners, we are no longer putting up with it, but we are not doing it for us, we are doing it for the kids
[Reply]
Okay I’m a single father in difficulty and I thought this site was about fathers for equality when it came to family law and being in their childrens lives, but lately I’m seeing this site turn into a more divisive and woman hating site.
This article does nothing to support the cause I thought we were after (same can be said of the baby in the microwave).
Can we just concentrate on the key issues without going to the extremes pointing out every obscure case trying to highlight woman are bad and men are hard done by.
Admin what does posting this article achieve? We know a female teacher has had sex with five male students from TEXAS. Yes? And?
Why post this rubbish it detracts form the actual cause I thought we were standing up for and only attracts the woman haters with an axe to grind to post on the blog “Oh I bet she gets a lesser sentence because she’s a woman…a male would get the electric chair.” Nonsense..
Crap articles only help to fuel vulnerable mens pain and make them more angry against woman when they need to be concentrating on the actual key issues and that is FATHERS 4 equality.
Look I havent just glossed over this article and posted re actively. I’ve actually read it a few times and cant find the point we would be after for this blog…I’m happy to have it explained to me.
Maybe rename this site to MEN 4 equality if you want to focus on every issue across the board.
[Reply]
dave aldridge. Reply:
May 18th, 2011 at 2:25 pm
While i agree with at least some of what you say Tom i suggest you look at some of the mothers sites and see the hatefull rants against men which are rampant on those sites before you make too harsh a judgement. Two old quotes spring to mind, one is that 2 wrongs don’t make a right, the other is that you have to fight fire with fire.
[Reply]
Old Tom Reply:
May 18th, 2011 at 2:44 pm
I am aware of some sites that have hateful rants against men but it doesnt mean this has to be the same.
Dont forget that women have a whole host of resources for their cause in the Internet (both good and bad). Men on the other hand have very limited sites they can go to…look at what Dads on the air has been reduced to. A once great forum has reduced to a spam haven for viagra and one particular conspiracy nutter to rant about Zionist theories.
I’d like to see F4E focus on the key issues and not fight fire with fire.
Please less articles pointing out woman in a negative way…it’s not the issue.
[Reply]
Howard Beale Reply:
May 19th, 2011 at 4:03 am
Have to agree with Tom. We fight fire with water. Taking an eye for an eye makes us all blind. I understand the objective of raising awareness that women can and do commit crimes against children but not persuaded this sensationalism helps the cause.
Craig Reply:
May 19th, 2011 at 4:20 am
i could be niave but I think that the media focus is on mens atrocities, with extreme cases of women shown, is that the stats? so I guess the point with this is, a negative media outlet at female crimes balances the media or helps it to balance the public opinion of what is true.
Whilst that seems like a teacher once said to me “so does a negatve and a negative make a positive (english teacher) and she said the answer was no, I dont think life was as simple as that. WE have to focus on the kids, and weave our way through public opinion as to which is the best way to achieve that, admin, sorry if that’s not your philosophy, and just an assumption, but if you want to go the shop and your inside, you have to open the door and start somewhere, yeah? so I hope I’ not treading on toes here.
[Reply]
You got it spot on Yanta. She’s still on full pay, because she’s not a man. Men are sacked immediately and calls for life behind bars or execution, ring out across the land.
She will be very unlucky to get much gaol time over this. Once she is put on the stand at her trial, she will recall some incident (where a MAN abused her) from the deepest darkest recesses of her sick mind, squeeze out a few crocodile tears and the Jury will all go, “Aw, poor thing, she must have really suffered at the hands of that evil man, we must let her go”.
She is guarranteed to get the “Female Discount” when sentenced anyway. But whether she spends any extra time in prison after the trial, will all boil down the the quality of the performance and how many tears she can manage to squeeze out in front of everyone.
All she has to do, is the same as all the other women do who never go to prison for crimes that range from petty theft, all the way to murder of husbands and children.
[Reply]
Why does she get leave WITH pay when men are summarily dismissed?
[Reply]
She’s a dirty cow who has sexually abused young adults in other words.
[Reply]