- Get Life Insurance Now, Fast Efficient and Reliable. Protect your children's tomorrow by preparing for their interests today.
The Family Law Amendment (Family Violence) Bill 2010, released by Attorney-General Robert McClelland on 11 November 2010, aims to prioritise the safety of children over other considerations, including the need for children to have a meaningful relationship with both parents.
The proposed amendments:
- increase the obligations on family lawyers and other advisors;
- broaden the definitions of family violence and abuse to include more specific behaviours;
- encourage people to submit evidence of abuse and family violence to the Courts; and
- remove obstacles for child welfare authorities who become involved in proceedings.
Background to the Family Violence Bill
Following the 2006 shared parenting reforms to the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), there was widespread concern that some incidences of family violence were being dismissed due to the need to prioritise a child’s relationship with both parents. Reports commissioned by the Family Law Council, Professor Richard Chisholm AM and the Australian Institute of Family Studies highlighted the need for a change to parenting laws to emphasise the safety of children as the paramount consideration.
A summary of the proposed amendments
Under the Family Law Act, there are two primary considerations that must be taken into account when considering what is in the best interests of a child – the need for the child to have a meaningful relationship with both parents, and the need to protect the child from physical or psychological harm. In situations where the child is subject to abuse or family violence, the Family Violence Bill places greater emphasis on the need to protect a child from harm.
The definition of ‘family violence’ within the Act is to be expanded to specify the types of behaviour that constitute family violence, including physical assault, harassment, emotional manipulation, financial abuse and threatening behaviour.
Similarly, the definition of ‘abuse’ of a child within the Act is to be extended to include physical abuse or non-accidental physical injury, sexual abuse and exploitation, psychological abuse (including situations where this may be caused by exposure to family violence) and neglect.
The Bill introduces the obligation for advisors (such as family dispute resolution practitioners, lawyers, family counsellors and family consultants) to encourage parents to consider the child’s best interests as the paramount consideration. There will also be an obligation placed on advisors to prioritise the protection of the child from harm where there are concerns about family violence or abuse.
A requirement will be introduced for parties to proceedings who allege family violence to file a Notice of Child Abuse or Family Violence with the Court. The Court will then be required to take prompt action to deal with the issues.
The Bill introduces obligations on parties to proceedings to inform the Court if there is a care order under a child welfare law in place for the child, and if the child is or has been the subject of a notification or investigation by a child welfare authority. Other people would also be able to provide this information to the Court.
The Bill removes provisions in the Act regarding the willingness and extent to which one parent has facilitated the child’s relationship with the other parent. These provisions are currently taken into account in determining the best interests of a child, and in considering orders when dealing with parenting arrangements and parental responsibility. Reports suggest that as a result of these provisions, some lawyers caution parents from alleging family violence or abuse where there is little evidence.
The Bill removes mandatory costs orders for a party to pay the costs of another party to proceedings if they have failed to substantiate claims in relation to family violence and abuse.
The Bill introduces a requirement for Courts that are dealing with applications for parenting orders to enquire about past or future risk, or the previous experience of the children, in relation to family violence or child abuse.
The Bill introduces immunity from costs orders for child welfare authorities and officers who intervene to become a party to proceedings under the Family Law Act at the request of the Court, where the officers act in good faith.
It’s worth noting that the amendments will not have any effect on family law matters where child abuse or family violence is not a concern.
The Family Violence Bill is open for public comment until January 2011. For more information on the Family Violence Bill and its effects on family law proceedings, please contact HopgoodGanim’s Family Law practice.
http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b47b3cee-93cf-4896-b499-02fd67390bbc
—
Know how to air your criticism with criticism books and audio psychology books.
Michael, sad to say that most police have as much contempt for the law they have sworn Oath or Affirmation to uphold as the Ag of the Commonwealth.
Zac, I don’t know where your coming from?
Hope you have a coffee or something handy if you want to know the truth, probably not but I have written it here for you to read if you want and what I have always said is the truth as much of the truth required or the law allows to be said.
If you were a Dad who had no contact with your children and Commonwealth (Cth) and State Court Orders preventing you having any form of contact, then you would realise your claim “your energy be better spent showing your kids that YOUR spare time is theirs†is a joke and offensive.
Considering the principal rule of our Court and Law is “Justice must be Done and Seen to be Done†has always been caused to stand in the shadows in my matters or applications as you will see if you read on.
This started with John Williams (VIC) demanding I withdraw Contravention applications citing the mother, filed and listed for a Return, or I would have no 2002 Christmas or birthday (about to happen before and after Christmas) contact with our children.
He even admitted in Court my refusal to comply with his, perversion of justice by, demand I withdraw the Contravention Applications filed and listed for a Return in the Court was causing the mother not to consent to Consent Orders sought to be made. (Yes I have it on transcript).
As usual, with such criminally intent persons you give them 1inch and they will demand the rest of the mile.
He them demanded I withdraw the Contempt of Court applications filed and listed for a Return citing the mother for multiple breaches of Court Orders with police evidence available, and her solicitor Fiona McGregor for Wrongful Representation of Family Court Orders applicable to Police, in contempt of her duty to the Court and the Law of Contravening Court Orders at that time. (Again I have got most of this evidence into transcript before the Dishonourable Mushin J refused Police to answer some of my questions claiming their knowledge of the Courts Orders and how they affected the State Court Orders and my contact with the children at the time of their attendance was not required.
Mushin J lastly threatened to abuse my mother if she gave any evidence that was detrimental to the party Mushin J claimed was a wonderful mother (1 of the many demonstrations of bias).
Mushin J finally disqualified himself from hearing any application I was a party to, Dec 2005, after the CJ asked him to, and she asked me to make that application to him, in Contempt of the Law that grants a judge a right to make any Order on their own initiation.
September 2005 he and I had a face to face in Court where I informed him he had committed criminal offences at our Final Hearing for him to instruct me:
If judges are not immune from prosecutions for their crimes at the beach then they will resign tomorrow.
Is this an admission of knowledge they often commit perversions of justice in some way or some like offense of is this an admission of knowledge Family Court judges often commit perversions of justice in some way?
For “Justice must be Done and Seen to be Done†to occur, there must be a proper hearing where all the evidence is allowed to be presented for a proper finding to be made by an other than bias determiner.
If not an Appeal will be granted for a rehearing, will it not?
To be labelled as a Vexatious Litigant the Law requires there to be a hearing where it is determined that there have been 2 or more applications that had “No Just Cause†for their filling hence the applications are determined to be Frivolous and or Vexatious.
Due to I have never had a proper hearing or determination of any application citing another party (John Williams caused me duress to withdraw) as a respondent I cannot have a proper or Lawful Label of Vexatious Litigant placed on me.
Such a label in my case is judicial abuse of power to cause a detriment to a party of a matter in breach of s.142.2 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) (s.142.2) “Abuse of public office†to enable a wrongful denial of “Leave†to file a proper application citing a responding party. Which are additional crimes committed by Bryant CJ as you will later read if you read on.
Bryant CJ stated in Court, Dec 2005, I had not had any determination of any application I had filed in the Court but stopped short of admitting that label should be removed or removed that label (hence breach of s.142.2) in the interest of the Law and the proper administration of justice was required.
That is 1 of the first offences of dereliction of duty and/or Contempt of her Oath or Affirmation of Office, remember her Oath is s26 of the Family Law Act (of the Act) that caused her to swear or affirm she would “do right by law to all†which the above stated misbehaviour is provable beyond doubt the Dishonourable CJ has committed Misbehaviour within the meaning of s.72(ii) of the Constitution (s.72(ii)) and/or 22 of the Family Law Act, hence my statement she will resign and leave the country if a Royal Commission of Inquiry is ever allowed to be established.
Remember the CJ in contempt of clause 5 of the Constitution and s.15B of the Crimes Act 1914(Cth) “Time for commencement of prosecutions†claimed from the bench the FamCA is not subject to the Law of the Crimes Act. If this is so then there is no limitations for the prosecution of any application for Contempt of Court and s.43 of the Crimes Act 1914(Cth) “Attempting to pervert justice†are, at minimum, 4 additional crimes provable beyond doubt committed by the Dishonourable CJ.
s.43 of the Crimes Act 1914(Cth) states: (1) Any person who attempts, in any way not specially defined in this Act, to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat, the course of justice in relation to the judicial power of the Commonwealth, shall be guilty of an offence.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
Contempt of Court is a course of justice created by a Law of the Cth being s.36 of the Act therefore it is not a Common Judges Law that a judge can interfere with or obstruct, only determine if there is prima-facie evidence in support a hearing of the proper evidence must be Returned.
Therefore, is it unlawful to hinder in any way any Contempt Application when sought with prima-facie in support? YES.
The evidence in support that the CJ hand in her Dishonourable Hands was transcript evidence in support of the applications hence it was more than just prima-facie evidence, again I say the Dishonourable CJ’s criminal offences are provable s.72(ii) Misbehaviour; provable beyond doubt that the Dishonourable AG has had in his hands or officers hands and only an Independent Royal Commission of Inquiry will cause s.72(ii) Proved Misbehaviour to be proven.
An Independent Royal Commission of Inquiry is urgently required into the perversions of justice perpetrated by the Mushin J, Bryant CJ, Hayden, Haynes, Kiefel and Crennan JJ of the High Court, and the AG, Mr dishonourable McClelland.
Nov 2010, Hayden J has demanded a Father seek “Leave†to file an application for a Writ of Certiorari claiming: to seek such a s.75(v) of the Constitution Writ is a Frivolous or Vexatious application pursuant to Rule 6.07 of the High Court Rules.
The only way this application could be Vexatious is if it cited the mother and not Flohm J to correct Orders made after Flohm J committed misbehaviours at the bench of preventing police from giving evidence of a mother’s false statements and attempting to make use of fabricated photographic evidence.
As you know, a s.75(v) of the Constitution Writ (s.75(v)) cities the judge and is for the quashing of the unsafe Orders made by that judge, it does not cite the other party therefore cannot be to cause repetitive without “Just Cause†hearings to a party of prior proceedings.
The “Just Cause†is not only Flohm J obstructed justice by preventing police giving evidence but this judge stated in her “Reasons for Judgement†words akin to if not the same: I will only accept evidence that is in contradiction to the Father’s. Is that not evidence of intent to pervert justice by obstructing or preventing evidence that supports the Father was telling the truth and the mother was not.
There is more like a fabricated e-mail, evidence a mother stole a father’s computer and the mother’s false allegations of Family Violence, State Court proven as false allegations.
Hence the matter sought, cannot be Frivolous because of the “Just Cause†stated above.
So has Hayden J committed a breach of s.43 of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) and or s.142.2 by abuse of power to cause a detriment of an obstruction or hindrance to justice and the quashing of unsafe Orders made by Flohm J? YES.
I SAY YES FOR THE 2ND TIME I PERSONALLY KNOW OF by obstructing a course of justice created by a law of the Commonwealth being s.75(v) and s.33 of the Judiciary Act 1903, with proper transcript evidence in his hands, sought to be filed with the application.
So did the judge know the evidence supported the Writ should be filed and a hearing had that would determine Flohm J had committed criminal misbehaviour that Parliament could use to pray to the Governor-General for her title of Judge be Dishonourably Removed if they choose and the unsafe Orders made in the mother’s favour BE QUASHED? YES.
Kiefel J, without giving me an opportunity to file an Affidavit of service of the Constitutional Notice I was required to file on each Attorney-General of the Cth, States and Territories. Therefore, without knowledge of if there aforesaid AG’s had been given Notice of a Constitutional issue within the application Wrongfully in breach of s.78B(1) and (5) of the Judiciary Act 1903(Cth) wrongly procedded to dismiss my application that had s.78B Notices and an affidavit of service outstanding, and less than 48 hours notice of a return in a State other than the State the matter had been filed in, hence no Oral Argument that had been stated in the Court documents filed was required for a proper understanding of the matter.
Kiefel J then WRONGLY claimed I had Appealed the wrongful Orders of Mushin J in contempt of her proper knowledge, namely the affidavit in support of the application Dishonourable Kiefel J was to determine, and WRONGLY claim, to seek a s.75(v) Writ was “An Abuse of Process†again because proper transcript evidence was sought to be filed with the application that would determine Mushin J had committed criminal misbehaviour that Parliament could use to pray to the Governor-General for his Dishonourable Removal if they choose and the unsafe Orders made in the mother’s favour BE QUASHED?
Haynes and Crennan JJ, in dereliction of their duty to the Court, claimed, in full knowledge of the Wrongs perpetrated by Kiefel J, that Kiefel J had not been in error by refusing “Leave to file†a s.75(v) application in the High Court. “3. The decision of Kiefel J is not attended by doubt. An appeal would enjoy no prospect of success.â€Â
Link to above said:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HCASL/2009/169.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=mackintosh
The only reason for a lack of success for the application was judicial intent to deny justice in conflict of interest by a bias determination of denial to protect a fellow judge from s.72(ii) “proved Misbehaviourâ€Â.
It should be NOTED Haynes was cited.
This sets new case law; that to seek a s.75(v) application in the High Court after an Appeal has been heard or dismissed is “An abuse of Process†but this is only in the “Reasons for Judgement†I have and can supply, which is in conflict with Rule 25.06.2 of the High Court Rules, that states:
“Where the judgment, order, conviction or other proceeding is subject to appeal and a time is limited by law for the bringing of the appeal, the Court or a Justice may adjourn the application for the order to show cause until the appeal is determined or the time for appealing has expired.â€Â
NOTE: Nov 2010, Hayden J’s demand a Father (not I this time) seek “Leave†to file an application for a “Constitutional Writ of Certiorari†that was sought almost 5 months after the time to Appeal had expired.
Hence , Hayden J has “Abused Public Office†to cause a detriment to a Father of a hindrance to the Father of seeking correction to Flohm J’s other than safe Orders made by a “Constitutional Writ of Certiorariâ€Â.
This Father has been under extreme pressure and duress at work and family illness, hence he has not been able to seek the “Courts Leave to File†the s.75(v) application doc’s Hayden J has obstructed hence additional duress of minimal interaction with is son and additional Family Violence in the mother’s home due to the mother’s diagnosed mental illness and other mother’s family issues.
YES I have knowledge of this matter as a McKenzie Friend.
But there is no time limit for applications of a Constitutional issue that involves a s.72(ii) of the Constitution issue, although the Contempt the Judges and AG have for the Constitution and Laws of Australia is such they will again attempt to pervert justice to obstruct or deny a finding of “Proved Misbehaviour†pursuant to the purpose of s.72(ii) of the Constitution.
In addition, Rule 25.06.2 of the High Court Rules, states: … such an Order to show cause is made not later than six months after the date of the judgement, order, ….
This of course is in conflict with s.72(ii) and s75(v) of the Constitution that s.72(ii) relies on for s.72(ii) “Proved Misbehaviour†while the AG refuses to comply with the Senate recommendation a “Judicial Misbehaviour and Incapacity Committee of Inquiry†be created consistent or like the NSW State like Committee.
Is this a good understanding of why I am continuing with the vague hope Justice and the Proper Honourable Administration of Justice will be returned to our Courts and the Queens reputation of being a Just Overseer of justice will be restored?
Yes, we are in effect a Republic but don’t tell the general Public because they wish to believe the Queen has the last say, although that was removed by s.22 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) which causes the Full Court to decide if an applicant may seek the Queens determination of a matter limited by this same Cth Law.
AS IF?
It is my son is who you are trying to block from your web site who has advanced IT ability who he claims TAG is the last time he has had as much fun as this time in defeating your attempts to block him viewing the 100 plus comments I can only see about 93 of 100 + posts.
Keep trying because he is having fun and it is more fun at 2:15am than I could ever provide, Zac, txs.
NO, s.121 or the Act only prevents the publication of identification of parties and children to a matter.
A Judge can be named in public or I would not have named Family and High Court Dishonourable judges
[Reply]
I can say from first hand experience that the Police do not help the situation ether. Speaking with number of police officers of different ranks, I can tell you for sure that Police think all fathers/men in Australia are violent people. Not only that, they think Women can not put a foot wrong. There is no way for a father can win in this situation.
I am not surprised at all, given the attitude the Government agencies show towards fathers. I am not sure what is the best way to fix this, however I have grave concerns about my son when he becomes a man himself.
[Reply]
joe Reply:
December 12th, 2010 at 11:26 am
They would be the naive police dept. Michael. There is plenty of documented violence INSIDE police stations and plenty of ‘reality TV and cctv evidence of over exuberant arrests by angry officers where they do real damage to someone. Someone should do an FOI on how much compo Australian police dept’s pay to injured, complaining and legally threatening combatants each year….enough to get them to change the teaching at the academies.
A former aussie rules coach of mine is currently an Inspector at my state police academy…I wont say that he was a violent man,but the whole playing squad knew that he loved using his fists in a game.Many tribunal appearances.
The footy culture demanded that if you’re not tough and ‘give some back’ to your opponent, then you’re a wimp of a man.
[Reply]
Michael Reply:
December 12th, 2010 at 10:39 pm
Joe
I think this is much deeper than footy culture of “Giving some back”. I think the training they receive (formally or on the job) tells them to be that way. Also the law and the rules are designed so to encourage them to be more harsh towards fathers/men.
Speaking with NSW ombudsman he quoted statistics suggesting most act of violence is by men. I am not sure how true that is or not, however even if it is I think our constitution contains the word somewhere in it “innocent until proven guilty”. The way they apply that law is “only for women innocent until proven guilty”. For men is “Guilty until proven innocent”.
This puts every father on the back foot when it come to seeing their children. The sad truth is even when they found a women/mother has deliberately lied they don’t do any thing about it.
Given this why would any women in their right mind go to court and speak the truth? Their lawyer knows this and the judges encourage it by not doing any thing about it.
This is absolutely criminal! There must be a way to do some thing about it?
[Reply]
And Ian, Because I live in a resort town there are at least three, fmr or current state ministers that frequent here..one is a fmr client of mine and she is a pal of Rob Hulls the current (caretaker) state A.G..
By your suggestion and If Labour retain office I should write to her for some help.
[Reply]
Ian you should be a barrister of Family Law.
The unsigned teacher’s affidavit was sent via Ausdoc to my second lawyer, Kennedy (Collins St 26 floors up) and my (Associate) lawyer didn’t flinch but said that the other side must have been rushed and didn’t have time to get a signature. Not true because a signed copy was never filed for the hearing…the unsigned affidavit was just intimidatory scare tactics i.e. “The teacher’s concurring with us.”
I suspect that my ex-wife, a career report writer in the health industry and bioethicist, ‘compiled’ the affidavit from distorted talks with the (normaly lovely but naive, gay female) teacher.
Is it only lawyers that can write and stamp a dubious affidavit in the name of someone in authority and distribute it to the person it defames and belittles..? What a great worktool that is.
That false and unsigned teacher’s affidavit was part of the group of lies that caused my 10 yo daughter to scratch hers arms and legs and threaten to cut herself. And I have sent proof to my local CAMHS (Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service)They did F.A. about it..
Is Mr. McClelland’s new bill going to protect young girls from what my daughter went through via her professional mother’s manipulation and lies? I don’t think so.
[Reply]
An unsigned affidavit is not worth noithing, it is how you use it against the person who served it that counts.
You have evidence of service by email, fax or post and start by “Why did you serve me with this unsigned affidavit?
Would the person you created this affidavit for not swear to your lies?
Did you ask them to swear to your lies? “No”
So why did you create or searve this affidavit? “My solicitor did not me” or the like.
You get the piont, Who created the affidavit and why can be as important as the lies within the affidavit when you add section 117AB of the Family Law to the outcome, look it up if you don’t know it. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fla1975114/s117ab.html
[Reply]
I hope you get to the media, Family Court judges threatened the media with Contempt of Court when I tried.
[Reply]
Hi Zac,
Although what you say is true, if the AG of the Commonwealth shows he will not uphold the Laws of the Commonwealth or the Constitution, how can we little people with only the power of our little voices expect lawyers and judges to do right by the law?
We should not but do, because we expect others to do what we do; right by the law and our moral expectations.
The sad fact is the AG and solicitors rely on us lttle people to do right and we find it toooooooo hard to pursue them for their wrongs.
You say: “I sent a letter and copy of the phantom affidavit to the Legal Services Commissioner (Vic) and GUESS WHAT…She couldn’t act on the poor, immoral and unethical behaviour of the lawyer because the lawyer was not my lawyer.
The whole industry needs a f….ing big broom put through it…Whoever gets elected to power today!
Message to blokes; Grow some balls and wear them with pride.â€Â
The Legal Services Commissioner (Vic) require direct references to the Legal Practices Act namely: Behaviour citied and claimed as “brings the Law fraternity into disrepute” before they will look at it and then only if you have power of a Powerful (like MP) supporter behind you.
You have a complaint; go to DIDS and get half a dozen of your mates to walk into your local MP’s office and complain about your solicitors wrongful, directions to you, behaviour.
Seek she/he put a “Question Without Notice†before Parliament of:
“Should there be an inquiry into the wrongful behaviour of solicitors practicing in State and Commonwealth Family Law due to claims of wrongful direction by those solicitors to parties in the Family Court and defending wrongful Family Violence Orders sought, including the wrongful Police Family Violence Orders obtained without evidence?â€Â
“Answer: YES, do I have a seconder?”
[Reply]
my case alone is enough, if we group together the strength will scare them to take notice, we have lived in fear of their tactics, lets make equality equality
[Reply]
ok i believe I have enough info to take to the media I have harrassment, proof the AVO against me was malicious intent, I have proof my legal team used hard ball tactics against me have proof that i was stalked, have proof, that all this is abuse to my kids, who else here is going to take this step ?
[Reply]
in my AVO case or PPO case the prosecutor tried to establish a text messgae from myself to my ex saying “eat my dust” was harrassment , so I should not have contact with her………. eheheheheheheheeee
they won how ridiculous is that………..
if I wanted to access to her would i send a message like that ?
[Reply]
Just an idea, if anyone wants to connect to me on facebook, they are welcome, providing it isnt a setup alias, and it might help public awareness too, if we all start showing we are supportive of our cause in the public eyes
[Reply]
Craig, My ex told the acting principal (female) on day one of separation that if I came near the school she would apply for an Intervention Order. Lucky that my mate’s wife is a senior teacher and tipped me off and I knew what rules we were playing under whilst the wife was trying to get me to sign the kids over in cafe meetings…
The current principal (male) was brilliant for turning my ex on her heals when she turned up EARLY on my access days and took the girls..but I had to be firm with him and point out to him that he would turn a dad around if breaching an order.
It is so sick..you have to keep involved otherwise your daughters will end up as clones of the hideous mother behaviour..
Deep breaths CAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALM !!
[Reply]
Thanks everyone for your replies, it is all very helpful, i appreciate it..
Zac, the area you brought up about the school councellor, if I hadn’t mentioned it already, the school thought I was allowed no contact with them at all for a period of about 6 months uptil last Thursday.
My new partner took the court orders into them, and they were suprised to learn I was allowed to have contact, you can imagine what went through their minds when they saw Fed Mag orders saying they live with us 50% of the time………………
A school councellor councelled my girls against me on their mothers advice lately and I’ll be chasing that up too…
[Reply]
and Craig, yes police wont take children from you unless there is a recovery order,( a lot of paperwork and a hearing required) when they can use force…It all age appropriate ….10 to 14 yo’s are the grey area..younger will go with whoever and older will just tell there enemies to f … off. just keep everything safe and fun and they will hang around forever..cheers
[Reply]
Craig, My last barrister told me that kids will vote with their feet. My 14 yo d has gone with the easy life at mums but she is always welcome here but with my respecting rules. My 10 yo d has extra nights with me because i’m in the school town and closer to friends..You should keep a journal when there is a variation to the arrangements,inform your ex of changes and keep it calm and safe feeling for your kids….It’s the kids’ actions that are going to unul the court orders the quickest.I wouldn’t be showing my kids that the court is more important than I am.
Also a Magistrate is never going to award an AVO (which you don’t want if not deserved) if there is any doubt about her claims.
Craig you really need to put the school counsellor right in the presense of the principal and remember they’ll be judging you so don’t get irate…you can show that you’re angry in a calm way.
There are so many dirty tricks out there in Family Law land. My ex’s lawyer ‘prepared’ an affidavit in the name of my daughter’s grade 5 teacher describing fear, family violence and contradicting the family report writer who rightly telephoned her for her report.
This affidavit was circulated 8 days before the residency hearing, but GUESS WHAT, it was unsigned and I just gave it to the principal to deal with. The regional office of education investigated the matter and found that the teacher had nothing to do with the affidavit, which if was true, she would have been obligued to ‘mandatorily’ report family violence.The principal rightly told me that because the affidavit was unsigned it was worth absolutely nothing.
My barrister at the residency hearing told me that this particular lawyer had done this several times before just prior to hearings.
I sent a letter and copy of the phantom affidavit to the Legal Services Commissioner (Vic) and GUESS WHAT…She couldn’t act on the poor, immoral and unethical behaviour of the lawyer because the lawyer was not my lawyer.
The whole industry needs a f….ing big broom put through it…Whoever gets elected to power today!
Message to blokes ; Grow some balls and wear them with pride.
[Reply]
Hi Craig,
Good to hear you got a positive result, so many have the judge turn on them because you are causing the mother trouble.
My answer was from the point of view of the law and there are always exceptions to the norm.
Good luck, sorry I will be away for a few days working but you can send me any question you may have to that same email.
[Reply]
I agree with Craig. If you haven’t done anything abusive and the kids love to be with you, there is nothing anyone can do from stopping your time with them. And most divorced wives would love for 50-50 if they could trust their ex to father well. Even with an abusive ex, there is still the hope, for the kids’ sake, that there will be change. And kids eventually vote with their feet anyway, unless they are petrified.
All the people I know who are not keen on ex spending time with their children are those who are concerned with the safety of their kids. I know of no exceptions.
[Reply]
Ian, just to add, I too have what you call police protection order against me, the Family Law court Judge and Federal Magistrate thought it irrelavent, basically they have said they over ride it. What’s more, I am fighting the AVO in the District Court.
It has been adjourned 11 times, is up for hearing soon.
The thing is, I have court evidence the woman has asked to have contact with me despite her saying i was a risk to her
Fight for your innocence
[Reply]
add me havenr64@live.com
I’m not upto speed with everything like you guys are, but I’m sure I could have some positive imput
[Reply]
Ian, please, i am not being facetious in my request, I am of the belief, or had the belief growing in myself, that although court orders may stand, if your kids wanted to be with you and verbalised it, and there’s no real evidence of abuse by the parent they are with, then they wont be taken physically from that parent despite orders.
I broke orders recently, kept my girls past when they were due back with their Mother, and the result was I got more time awarded.
And despite many warnings from my own lawyer, from my ex’s support crew, and beliieve me they tried scaring me about breaking the orders, despite all of the fear tactics, no-one came to take them from me.
I even took them to a police station and admitted I was in breach of orders, the police said ” do what you think is right”
I guess my question should have been, can they enforce the orders ?????????/
[Reply]
This was in responce to Craig filling a ICC application
[Reply]
Add me, I have the physical evidence that supports your claim including High Court Transcript and responces to Parliamentry Petitions that will give your application weight.
mackian27@hotmail.com
[Reply]
To bring us back to the Dishon AG,
We need a MP to state in the Parliament:
“I seek Leave of the Honourable Speaker, a vote of NO CONFIDENCE in the Attorney-General be made†and
“Leave I seek it be moved this is Urgent Government Businessâ€Â.
This will cause the Honourable Speaker to move an Order or Motion an inquiry into the AG’s misbehaviour of cronyism (protection of judges from “Proved Misbehaviourâ€Â) occurs and his removal if proven.
[Reply]
We need to concentrate on causing justice to return to the Courts also.
Without the proper administration of justice that require judges and lawyers to do right by law, pursuant to their oath or affirmation of office/position, we can expect more lawyers like Zac describes.
This is a common position of Child Rep’s (ICL’s) because your lawyer doing such is in breach of the Legal Practitioners Act by bringing the Legal Fraternity into Disrepute,
That is she has made a false representation of your rights and committed a dereliction of duty to Zac as a client.
In contempt of the Commonwealth Law and Constitution the High Court have created a Common Law of immunity for lawyers from prosecution of their criminal wrong committed against the best interest of their client in conflict the clause 5 of the Constitution and the Civil and Political Rights Convention (or like name) that both cause all people of the Commonwealth (that includes judges) to be obedient (or like words) to the Law of the Commonwealth and Civil Prosecution for wrong done to a person.
[Reply]
Yes!!!!!!!
Ask my children, the dishonourable Mushin J did and demanded I seek his leave to correct his orders, he refused to return a decision on the question of “Leave to apply to the Court†that have never been able to be corrected due to the High Court have also refused to hear an application for the correction of Mushin J’s orders and Bryant CJ granted Mushin J an illegal immunity from prosecution also to unlawfully prevent me and my family (agents of mine) from having written communication with the children.
No birthday or Xmas cards, school information or even if they were alive or killed by their “Borderline Personality Depression†diagnosed mother.
Ask those who have Family Violence Orders made wrongfully against them like I.
My ex used lies about what Mushin J had said without transcript to get her Orders that I have never been allowed to appeal or correct by Writ.
Ask those in Tas who have Police protection Orders made against them without hearing!
Or a your being facetious in your request?
[Reply]
http://www.equalparenting.org.au/
[Reply]
Can anyone stop you from having your kids if they want to be with you ???????????
Today I found out, the school my two younger Girls go to, thought I was not allowed any access to them at all for a very long time, just to help you understand, I have never been stopped from contact with them, and currently have a FEDERAL magistrates order for 50% access, meaning they are with me half the time……….. The School thought, or believed the Girls mother, they assumed…………………………… I was the bad guy and a School councellor actually argued to my Daughters that I was a bad Father on the word of their Mother…………………
Isn;t that illegal ??????????????????/
[Reply]
I’m going to reinforce this message, and hopefully typo free, and I invite any debate or information, infact I crave it because I believe it’s the biggest hoax for Fathers in the event of seperation or divorce.
They cannot stop you from allowing your kids to live with you unless there’s proven evidence of physical or sexual abuse.
They (they being the law, family, ex, womens groups etc) will use fear factor one thousand and harrass you, but they can’t do anything.
Now, here’s the Debate issue or question i put to anyone,——
If you choose to allow your kids to live with you, can anyone stop it from happening ??????????????????????????
[Reply]
Further to Craig yes calmness and clear thinking is the key..not as much in the courtroom as in front of your kids..they will always gravitate to sensibilities.
My mid-fifties country female lawyer of only five years experience made a hugh blunder which I have asked the Legal Services Commissioner to review.
She told me that the only way that I could see my daughters, post separation and before the Residency Hearing was through supervised daytime access. She told me this 3 days after my 10 yo daughter ( the subject of a false child molestation claim by the wife) had tried to escape her mother and return to me in her home town..totally aware that her mother had lied in an affidavit filed two days before that. Police returned my daughter to her PSYCHOLOGICALLY abusive mother and maternal grandmother where she self harmed in the following week.
I said to my lawyer..”Why should I agree to supervised access when I have done nothing wrong and to agree with it would imply that I had?”…My lawyer replied,”You want to see your daughters don’t you?”
By the time I got to a residency hearing and agreed to shared parenting to avoid more expense, my legal bill was $65,000
[Reply]
Wow Ian Mcak, what insight, and I thank you for it, and the more I learn the more I realise, thses things…..
Keep the Children in focus
Don’t get caught up in any argument, be it by the ex, her support crew, the lawyers, even your own, the ICL, or the Judge.
Remember these things, if the kids choose to live with you and there is no proven abuse against you, no-one can stop them from living with you, not even a Federal Magistrate order.
Be Strong
They can;t stop those kids from being with you if you allow it, and they are not being abused, they can threaten you, they can , i have ,any saved messages from relatives and even my own lawyer saying if I dont hand them back I’ll be in gaol or break a bond or they’ll be taken off me, or the outcome will be bad, even my so called brother spoke to Ken the registrar and said i was in the shit………. the outcome? even though I was shitting myself, I got rewarded with 50% care…………..
They cannot stop your kids from kiving with you
[Reply]
What “Craig says: November 23, 2010 at 1:59 am. Liegh, (and all parents) speaking to guys who don’t have access isn’t necessarily your answer, maybe talking to guys that have attained access after access had been taken away, might be a wiser choice.†Is so true; but what might also help your thinking is to talk to those children who are now over 18yrs old who have been denied access to their father and their fathers family. Remember there is more family violence committed in a single mother’s home an a single father’s home and that is what you need to stay true too. A sad but true fact is most turn on their mother for their lost years of family life.
Remember it is not only the father but also the members of his family (his father, mother brothers, sisters and their children) who are being denied knowledge and time with those children obstructed from spending time with their father.
The “Family Violence Protection Act 2008 Part 2, sect 7: sets out the Meaning of emotional or psychological abuse.
This includes the following: “preventing a person from making or keeping connections with the person’s family, friends or culture, including cultural or spiritual ceremonies or practices, or preventing the person from expressing the person’s cultural identity;â€Â
A sad but true fact: most children denied time with their father and his family find their father and his family then turn on their mother for their lost years of family life when it is reaffirmed to them that there was not real reason for the mother to deny their contact.
My hardest thing other than seeking justice in the Court and Parliament is encouraging our son to continue spending some time with his mother and younger sister. After about 6 years of no contact, about 4 months of State Court battles, where I was told a direction from the Family Court was any matter of mine should be obstructed and that no matter of mine should be found in my favour.
Under protest, a Children’s Court judge turned on the Family Court recommendation when evidence was to be produced from the Family Court past proceedings of the judge and mothers wrongs.
The short of it is: a Family Court judge changed the mother’s evidence from a lie to the truth and claimed that was the mother’s evidence. Claimed I had admitted and committed family violence when I had done neither. Repeatedly threatened to send me to jail if I attempted to produced evidence detrimental to the mothers case, and threatened to abuse my mother if she started giving evidence detrimental to the mother’s case. Also made an Order I needed his “leave†before I could start any other proceedings in that matter to which he refused to return a determination when I sought his “Leave†with 2 Physic Reports in my favour. No appeal could occur because of the cost and the High Court perverted justice to prevent s75(v) of the Constitution Writs to conceal this judges “Provable Misbehavioursâ€Â.
Bryant CJ later, in Contempt of s22 and s35 of The Family Law Act (the Act) and s72(ii) of the Constitution granted that judge immunity to prevent “Proved Misbehaviourâ€Â. The Federal Police, AG and the High Court have repeatedly refused to allow an investigation or proceeding that would prove my allegations because the evidence I have provided to each of them is proof beyond doubt of the crimes committed by the first judge and numerous judges plus the AG’s to conceal this judges “Provable Misbehavioursâ€Â.
Because I won the Children’s Court matter our about 15 ½ yr old son’s mother throw him out of the Court Ordered residence for the children onto the street with no ph or contact information for me; where he lived, sleeping in greenhouses and friends homes for about a month before he and I reconnected.
Cronin J claims ‘this can be done by the mother and the mother is not in contempt of the Family Court Orders’ or words kin. Therefore, the Orders of the Court only apply to a father NOT THE MOTHER.
Our son has now been living with me full time since about May, travelling an hour and a half to and from his chosen school.
We have been lucky by the fact my ex had a short term (about 3 yr) partner living in the home who has similar beliefs and thinking to I, so our son has turned out to be a real nice young man. Although I have to laugh when I hear him quote things I said to him when he was 7-8yrs old like: “would you like that done to you, NO, so why do it to them?â€Â
His NZ Grandparents finally got to meet him again; his Uncle, Aunty and cousins have re-established their relationships and are often asking when he is next going to stay with them again. Sadly his almost 13 yr old sister is still missing out on our family times together, it has been claimed this is due to she is scared of what her mum will do to her if she sees me or my family. Hopefully time will change that although our son claims she is so like his mother he does not want her to live here with us.
Remember:
1. Don’t do any wrongs because they will come back to bite you.
2. Be patient, time is a wonderful heeler.
3. Don’t expect justice in the Courts, it is a thing of the past that reduces their workload and income.
4. You are not alone,
a. Remember the judge who admitted the father was the better parent so placed the children in Foster care, whether or not their attempts to commit suicide have been successfully or not, I don’t know.
b. You probably don’t know of the Parramatta judge who refused to allow police to give evidence of a mother’s attempts to make false allegations of family violence, fabricated photographic evidence, prove the mothers false statements from the witness box and the fabricated memory of a child. The High Court have perverted justice to prevent a Writ to correct those wrongs.
5. More often than not there is someone worst off than you; so long you are there in a good way when they come for you things will work out in your favour.
Pursuit of a “Judicial Misbehaviour Commission/Committee†and Act in Parliament, I believe, is the only way we will cause justice to return to our Court system; hence the judges threaten resignation and the AG refuses (or should I say, makes false representation, about 4 abandoned “Bills†to date) to create such a Committee, Commission or Act.
[Reply]
Liegh, speaking to guys who don’t have access isn’t neccessarily your answer, maybe talking to guys that have attained access after access had been taken away, might be a wiser choice. Just because you work, doesn’t mean Legal Aid won’t help you, and even if you don’t get access to Legal Aid, here’s a few tips.
1.. If you haven’t abused your kids physically or sexually or in fact if no abuse can be proven behond hearsay, you have every right to see them, and you should not let fear stop you from trying.
2 Research, don’t give up use research to keep you motivated.
3 Tell the truth the whole way, dont use crap against your kids to make them anti Mum, if Mum is doing the wrong thing then your kids will work that out, they are smart and will know the truth. That advice has been given to me by honest police even, that have gone through the same ordeal.
4 Stay strong, don’t let anyone intimidate you, if you haven’t wronged (EG) abuse, and your kids want time with you, no law, no lawyer, no police no relative can stop it, you have more rights than any of those people no matter who they are.
hope that helps.
[Reply]
you are being scammed, it doesnt matter what the laws are who the AG is, who says what, if the kids are old enough and want to be with you guys more often, no-one can stop them, they can only use fear to prevent you trying
[Reply]
I would be glad to Brad, bring it on !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and Zac thank you, oh, there’s more, I used to laugh off my ex poisoined me, my vomiting, hair loss, diarrheoa, shakes seizures were put down to lack of sleep stress and drinking, ……………………….. guess what, i havent changed a thing since i dont have contact with my ex and i’ve nearly lost all symptoms, and another person came forward telling me they think my ex was poisoning them, then I heard that she wanted me dead, then i heard she used to laugh about what poisons she’d use…………….. well, it’s in the hands of detectives now, who work accross the road from a pub that my ex worked at……………………………….
it’s like a hollywood movie
[Reply]
My partner and I have recieved a ‘Family Report’ from a pycologist..what a joke…he the Pycologist told us when we went for our ‘counselling’..he told us “Yes I can see your concern and this needs to be rectfy….”…What a Joke…it all went on the Mothers side…so this Pycologist is saying…to us
1. The Mother can smack her children..
2. The Mothers Partner can bite the children for a form of discipline..
3. We have to communicate with the Mother more….(she does not Want to communicate with us)
4. The 4 yr old child was lying to us about being hit under the feet with a stick…by Mothers Partner…
5. Its ok for a 4 yr old to stay in DayCare for 5 days a week..from 7.30am to 6.00pm…
6.Its ok if the 2 older girls aged..8ys..11yrs to stay home alone from 7.30am to 7.00pm (public holidays and school holidays and wkends
7. Im a childless Partner..who has no idea how to bring up children…but big hearted…and my partner would rely heavily on me to support the children…(I have to cease my employment as a Social Worker to stay home with the children) which I would leave my work in order to take care of the children..( Pycologist is saying my partner works long hours and he has to rely heavily on me…BUT the Mother and Partner work in the same company as my partner…WHO do they rely on to look after the children?
8. My partner and I drive 1000km to see the children once a month for 12hrs..so its ok for the Mother not to drive half way..(we do all the travelling..)
9. Holidays we travel 2000km round trip..to pick up children and we spend $1000 a week this includes special diet..head lice treatment..and flu treatment..
10.Child Support..we pay top dollar..and still pay it when we have children in our care..child support will not pay us a cent …but thats ok with the pycologist..
AND SO MUCH MORE….TO SAY..SO THESE SEXIST PIGS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE PYCOLOGIST ARE ON THE SAME BOAT…PLAYING WITH FATHERS EMOTIONS…AND ALEINATING PARENT ABUSE..I cannot believe what this pycologist was thinking…BUT..can understand..why he the pycologist said to us first up..I will not tolerate abuse …and bad behaviour…hahaha..NOW I can see WHY..he said that…WHAT A JOKE …PYCOLOGIST YOUR A JOKE…HEY ATTORNEY GENERAL YOUR A JOKE…!!!!
PS…I WILL NOT TOLERATE ABUSE FROM YOU ATTORNEY GENERAL..!!!
[Reply]
I would like to speak with fathers, who don’t get to see their children. Because the legal costs are so great, that it makes it impossible for a working father.
[Reply]
Yes Jack that Tassie law is the pits and so discriminatory and backward thinking…. talk about balls in a vice.
A copper turned up to my ex’s departure because I refused to leave (my home) and I wouldn’t let her take my dog (registered to me and a working dog) The cop later told me that he told my ex that she hadn’t (yet) described any reason for his attendance- but she insisted anyway- because her dad was a top cop.
When I refused to sign my wife’s grossly unfair parenting order she then went on to use cops for AVOs (all failed) , Child molestation allegations FALSE ,so unprovable, child welfare checks (all clear)
That new law has made Tasmania a backward state where it once may have been a honeymoon state. If that law existed in Victoria I would have been totally Rogered. Good business for undertakers though.
[Reply]
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/mens-groups-meet-to-defend-shared-parenting/story-e6frg12c-1225828486771
MEN’S advocacy groups are joining forces to defend shared parenting laws, which they say are under threat after the release of a government-commissioned report.
[Reply]
don,t get me wrong there are some fabulous women out there.
There are also some with self centred agendas and it is good when women take this issue up to protect their men from false accusations of violence. Women are very perceptive about these issues.
The former Attorney General wrote to me and said that allegations of intimidation must be “reasonable”.
In practice the Police will proactively issue P,F.V.O’s to shift the risk of potential litigation from themselves and the devil take care of the poor defendant who often is not granted the courtesy of an interview.
The presumption of innocence doesn’t exist, nor property rights nor the rights of the child all based on hearsay untested accusations of one person.
Court ordered mediation is a joke because the Complainant can pretend intimidation and refuse to attend.
The system seems to allow years of revenge based vexatious litigation including sexual allegations all the usual get even tricks.
Guys tread carefully the system can do you like cold turkey, that is why there are so many male suicides in this country.
jack
[Reply]
It is feminist government assisted family violence according to their own definition.
Violence against men is condoned to make money for the legal profession $30000 not uncommon!
As a matter of interest the Safe At Home legal aid people in Tassie state in their brochure “talk to the Police they will assist you obtain the outcome you want) i.e. predetermine the outcome of the Justice system. i.e. how to remove an unwanted partner from his (usually male) home and children by Police Judicial Order for 12 months and longer!
Violence against men Australia says NO!
[Reply]
Try this link to the Draft Bill with ammendments:
http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;db=LEGISLATION;id=legislation%2Fbills%2Fr4489_first%2F0000;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr4489_first%2F0001%22;rec=0
Try this link to the Draft Bill Schedule(s)
http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr4489_first%2F0001%22;rec=0
Try this link to the Draft Bill with ammendments:
http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fems%2Fr4489_ems_6b88480c-d72b-4d95-a82e-c9a478fb642f%22;rec=0
I might be blind? I cann’t see how this Bill will affect section 117AB of the Family Law Act 1975 regarding Costs where false allegation or statement made.
Can someone please show me what I cannot see?
[Reply]
Craig, Look in older comments for Brad Turner (near Leave Comment) If he doesn’t answer soon we could assume an alterior motive or ‘he’ has had a mishap.
I agree that this is not a woman hating site. I’m desperately wanting to be THE proper role model for my daughters in the absence of proper role model behaviour of their mother- but there is NO denigration on my part. Being healthy and compassionate, my daughters love their mother,extremely sick as she is.
I have also found a marvelous, strong partner, who was my daughter’s Pre-school director and has lovely older daughters. She was also able to give me another incite into my ex’s behaviour by spotting her as a man hater whilst on committee together.
You, or your fiance, may need an A.V.O.on your ex? All the best.
[Reply]
I have a fabulous woman, my 3 daughters currently 50% of the time, and it’s only a matter of time they are here fulltime, my Fiance, has 6 Children 2 of which are 22 and have moved on or in the process. that leaves 7 kids two adults. My eldest lived with me since seperation, she was 14 then, my other two, who have been with me 50% of the time, excepting when false allegations against me were upheld in local court, spent two months not seeing me, and in all that time my ex has been receiving centrelink, fulltime centrelink payments for those Girls. She claimed she was the main bread winner too, but has only worked fulltime for about 18 months out of the last 22 odd years.
My new Fiance feels guilty that I work and she doesn’t, and yet she is trying to help the transistion of the two families, handle all the police coming around (because the ex kept sending them) handle getting all the kids to school, three seperate schools, handle the 15 court cases in 12 months that my ex caused, still more to come, handle my ex abusing her, and handle watching my younger two go back to their Mother scared and in tears, she’s watched me be arrested twice, still being appealed, handle seeing the Girls dragged away by police, I cannot believe how good she is, how strong she is how wonderful she is, I might well of been a statistic if it wasn’t for her. Not all women are bad, there is great women out there and I am lucky to have one so wonderful. This is not a women hating site, it is to stop abuse of kids and men by feminists, women, police, govt depts and to raise awareness to the world and the media, that it is wrong what happens in this country, now please, do whatever you can to help your kids or spouses, please help the Children !!!!!!!!!!
[Reply]
Don’t feed the family law industry! Sell your assets! Stash your cash!(not in a bank! lol) and tell them all to go f–k them selves! I did and you know! there is nothing like taking control of your own life! Be a man! If you don’t fead a parisite! it dies! I personaly to this day would rather go to jail then comply to the Family Law Act!
Low lifes! the lot of them! Family wrecking social parisites. And don’t take it out on your women!! they only do it cause family law incourages this sort of negative domestic behavour. Take it out on the ass holes invading and destroying your life and family unit! Find your balls if you still have them!!
[Reply]
What did this Brad Turner say, the link wont work for me
[Reply]
To look at the first reading and Explanatory memoranda follow the following link. If it will not upload send the dishonourable AG a request for a response as to why you cannot read what the law requires you to be able to read.
http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;adv=yes;orderBy=priority,title;page=2;query=Dataset_Phrase%3A%22billhome%22%20ParliamentNumber%3A%2243%22;rec=11;resCount=Default
Furthermore ask how you can respond to this Bill that no ability to respond to has been created so is it the Dishonourable AG or some other Dishonourable person seeking this Bill in the name of the Dishonourable AG?
[Reply]
Forwarded Message Attachment–
From: peterblunt146@hotmail.com
To: president@fathers4equality-australia.org
Subject: RE: F4E: Review the proposed Family Law amendments and provide us some feedback
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 02:33:22 +0000
This stupidity continues
I have previously written to ministers and the attorney general
only to be told that we(they) have to protect women from violence
this I totally agree with,
but my letter was my personal case where there was no violence from me but i sought a restraining order for the ex-wife who entered my property without consent and was blocking my access to the children
so the ministers just fobbed me off with protecting the rights of the vunerable
how hippocritical it is when- you cant be vunerable because you have a penis?
I had been threatened numerous times, my ex made every mediation difficult, even trying to take mediators out of the room so she could talk privately- who knows what she said -when it is not up for scrutiny.
and now lie to your hearts content- or should we say lie to your revenges content?
So now it is to continue to be sanctioned-LIES TO COURT LIE TO MAGISTRATES-to get your own way and cause suffering.
It is this ill thought out and guttless legislation that leads to men being very vunerable and creates a situation where they see there position as futile, it is not far to go to contemplate suicide.
I am disgusted by these changes- although it is a re-encforcement of the untenable position of divorce fathers, rather than a change.
P
[Reply]
To Brad Turner, I have a 17 page police statement that I sent to my District Superintendant in 2008 primarily and headed, “on behalf of my daughters’ future health.”
This document outlined my suffering (and my daughters’ suffering) at the perjurous hand of my ex-wife in regard to false claims of child molestation against me to his region’s child abuse unit and other child protection authorities and individuals.
The Supt. replied that he would NOT authorise a ‘soft’ interview of my daughters (then 11 & 6) because disclosures made by my daughters (that they knew their mother ‘made up’ a report (and made a false ‘notification’) to his staff, “could not be used in the Family Law proceedings and this was not a function of Victoria Police.” ………TO PROTECT CHILDREN????
In this statement I also asked that a Forensic Psychiatrist or the DPP should read my sworn (and true) declaration that had very methodically shown my ex-wife’s contradictions in her statements, affidavits, interviews with child protection (obtained under F.O.I.) disclosures made to our Federal Magistrate Court (65L) counsellor and her disclosures made to me which were legally recorded and witnessed.
The Supt. claimed that his staff had acted properly and that I had no recourse with Victoria Police as I was not charged with any offense.
I replied and suggested to the Supt. that he was not going to confirm the revelations of perjury and ‘perverting the course of justice’ in my statement, because my lying ex-wife was female, a health professional/ bioethicist (Monash) and that she was a daughter of a former Snr. Sgt.(dec)- Victoria Police.
Not surprisingly, there was no reply to this second letter.
Brad,Is this the type of injustice you are looking for? And will your process protect my daughters anonymity and health?
[Reply]
I am an abusive father also…
I’m sorry that I disciplined my 10yo (in textbook style) when she told me to “piss off.” Causing her mother to vacate 3 days later with kids.
I’m sorry that I disciplined our dog (again appropriately) after he chased beautiful King parrots on our holiday.
I’m sorry that I didn’t answer a text message from my daughter because I was digging a sewer trench (leaving my phone in the lunch room) and causing my 13 yo to swear at me via voicemail.
I’m sorry that I signed off on a text to my daughter saying, “See you tonight. Love Daddy xxx” which triggered my ex-wife to write in her next affidavit, “The husband sent our daughter text message(s) containing affectionate wording”
I’m sorry that I sat on my daughter’s bed listening to her problems which caused my wife to falsely state in an affidavit, “The husband entered our daughter’s bedroom AND THEN SHUT THE DOOR”
I’m sorry that I took my 10 yo daughter from our country home to a night time AFL footy match as a bonding exercise which then caused my estranged wife to FALSELY write in an affidavit that I asked my daughter to sleep with me at the motel near the M.C.G.
If I have described abuse of a child above, then I am eternally sorry that I didn’t do more to prevent it. I have a brother, both parents and two grandparents who were/are career educators and we seem to have failed to protect my daughters.
[Reply]
Brad Turner,
Most blokes go through actual hell with the ‘separation set-up’ . To the lobbyists, women groups and its ideologies still demand further oppressive measures. But IMO, the most evil of the bunch are the ones making huge sums of money, whilst writing their pantomimes of drama, at the suffering expenses of their so called clients.
My story is pretty lame compared to some unfortunate victims. But I am still vexed by the abuse and predetermined outcome, chosen by those I trusted to care for my child’s legal rights.
Good luck with your case, but how can I be proved you’re seriously advocating this issue, and not masquerading for other parties?
No offence intended, I hope you understand.
Chas
[Reply]